April | 2012 | Thomas' Work Space

Calendar ICS corruption

2012/04/26 plagwitz Leave a comment

The (Drupal-based?) ICS linked for the ACADEMIC calendar does not display properly in MS-Outlook and other ICS-compatible calendar readers (all events form the Academic calendar seem to get display at the current date and time when this screenshot was taken. The ICS portion for the Administrative calendar does not seem to have the same problem).
Both do seem to display on the Provost webpage:
The same holds true for the underlying registrar calendar ICS that is aggregated by the provost’s page.
Some debugging information when loading http://provost.uncc.edu/calendar/ical : “You have subscribed to “p.”. 19 out of 169 events were successfully added to your calendar. There seemed to be some problems with the other events in the file you were importing.”

2012/04/26 plagwitz Leave a comment

Based on Europarl, Wikicorpus (2006!), MultiUN. From their metadata page:

Metadata for Corpus del Español Actual
Corpus name	Corpus del Español Actual
CQPweb’s short handles for this corpus	cea / CEA
Total number of corpus texts	73,010
Total words in all corpus texts	539,367,886
Word types in the corpus	1,680,309
Type:token ratio	0 types per token
Text metadata and word-level annotation
The database stores the following information for each text in the corpus:	There is no text-level metadata for this corpus.
The primary classification of texts is based on:	A primary classification scheme for texts has not been set.
Words in this corpus are annotated with:	Lemma (Lemma)
	Part-Of-Speech (POS)
	WStart (WStart)
The primary tagging scheme is:	Part-Of-Speech
Further information about this corpus is available on the web at:	http://sfn.uab.es:9080/SFN/tools/cea/english

To use, “consult the IMS’s brief description of the regular-expression syntax used by the CQP and their list of sample queries. If you wish to define your query in terms of grammatical and inflectional categories, you can use the part-of-speech tags listed on the CEA’s Corpus Tags page.”
Also provides frequency data (based on word forms or lemmas, and others – up to a 1000):
Examples of a frequency query result (click for full-size image. Note that a lemmatized list was requested here which links all inflected forms back to the lemma, and vice versa, upon clicking the lemma, displays a KWIC view containing all forms subsumed under that lemma, see picture above):

2012/04/25 plagwitz Leave a comment

All other things equal (given a limited amount of time), teachers can provide more and better corrective feedback on student oral proficiency recordings if, during their grading, they could easily insert their own oral comments into the students’ recordings (delivered as MP3 files to teachers’ desktops after Sanako oral exams).
Both the Sanako Tutor and Student Player have a voice insert mode that is much easier and quicker to use than (albeit not free as) editing the student audio in Audacity (which we still recommend for bare-bone viewing/listening because of Audacity’s capability of loading and displaying multiple tracks simultaneously).
Fortunately, Sanako tutor/student player are available on the teacher/student station PCs in the LRC (the latter’s insert function is available when the PC connected to the running Sanako Tutor on the teacher station).
How easy and fast is it to use this? As you can see in this demo screencast on how to use Sanako voice insert to add spoken comments into your students’ Sanako oral exams, voice insert only requires:

a click on the voice insert button in the center, whenever a user wants to speak during listening,
and, from the top left menu, a “file”/ “save as” at the end.

In a next step – not only during the grading process –, how easy is it to distribute student recordings made with Sanako to students? That is TBA:a different story.