Archive
Archive for the ‘4-skills’ Category
A comparison of options for student oral photo presentation assignment
2013/01/15
Leave a comment
- Objective: Student presents personal photos in target language (e.g. home). b
- Contenders for Tools:
- Voicethread (free version)
- University-environment
- For Multimedia authoring:
- MS-PowerPoint
- not yet contenders
- MS-Community Clips (screen capture recording, to be installed)
- benefit: single purpose, record yourself talking while flipping through the images on your computer
- cost: new tool to learn, and no long term perspective
- Sanako Student Recorder: not a contender, it has subtitling options, but cannot author multimedia presentations (teachers used to with the Sanako authoring tool, but this is not longer supported).
- MS-Community Clips (screen capture recording, to be installed)
- As LMS: Moodle.
- For Multimedia authoring:
- Comparison:
- Student
- Authoring:
-
Assignment submission: Voicethread (free) has no support for assignments, only for sharing. Students have to find a way to submit their Voicethread,
- Sharing/peer-editing/grading:
- (Moodle would win where it has peer-grading options. YMMV:) Sharing within the class is possible, but sharing with "anyone" is a privacy (possibly FERPA) issue, and sharing with a handmade class list (no import) is tedious.
- Teacher: grading
- Managing submissions
- (LMS wins?:) Voicethread (free) does not allow an export that could be uploaded to the LMS.
Student can email links or invitations like these:
. It is up to you managing them, and completion of assignment and grading for the class. This is no LMS gradebook. - (Voicethread wins:) PowerPoint can be saved as a slideshow that starts on click (save as .ppsx) (including with narration). But opening and listening, without the need for saving to a local file, remains easier in Voicethread.
- (LMS wins?:) Voicethread (free) does not allow an export that could be uploaded to the LMS.
- (Voicethread wins:) Providing feedback is possible,
including oral
– but is this insert recording? And providing editing access is not the default:
- Record-keeping:
- (Moodle wins:) Voicethread: Uh.. oh..?! I see no retention story, especially not in the free version. With Moodle, you can leave all that to the institutional support.
- Managing submissions
- Student: receiving feedback
- (A tie:) Voicethread’s audio feedback versus Moodle/PowerPoints gradebook access.
- Learning curve:
- Voicethread has the advantage of being a specialized tool (relatively few options, still relatively simple interface – few distractions).
- Other tools have the advantage of greater familiarity in the long run and reusability. Of course it depends also where you are working: stable positions get greater benefit from embarking on the institutional environment.
- Student
-
Summary: PowerPoint/Moodle remains the solution for the pedagogical task at hand that the LRC currently supports. Fortunately
- a narration of a picture presentation using PowerPoint and
- its submission by the student and grading by the teacher on the basis of a Moodle single file upload assignment are not too difficult.
Imran’s Phonetic Keyboard for Arabic
2013/01/06
4 comments
Learners of Arabic who type in Arabic on a Western Keyboard prefer a keyboard layout closer to the phonetic of the US keyboard than the Arabic keyboard layouts that MS provides (but try also phonetically transcribing IME like Google Arabic Input or Microsoft Maren – provided the pedagogy of your writing assignment permits that! Also note the LRC has 1 hardware keyboard with overlay keys for Arabic). Here is what your keyboard installation looks like in intl.cpl: ![]()


